SWEDISH MISSION COUNCIL RESILIENCE WORKSHOP
Resilience
capacities are cultural. They are difficult to define and even more difficult to measure. There is need to think outside the box when coming up with results frameworks
Absorb ⇒ adapt ⇒ Transform
What
capitals can support resilience? And how are they interconnected with each
other?
The capitals are;
1. Human
2. Natural
3. Social
4. Physical
5. Financial
6. Institution
2. Natural
3. Social
4. Physical
5. Financial
6. Institution
MEMBER ORGANISATION GROUP REFLECTION-
IAS
Ketema; IAS Country Director- Ethiopia
IAS is unique in its approach to resilience- in terms of drilling and the Tharaka irrigation project
Bernard; IAS Project coordinator- Tharaka, Kenya
Staff exchange visits in similar thematic areas project
locations should be organised in order to increase knowledge
Humanitarian act; Notes
- There is a clear difference between relief/humanitarian and development
- There is a need for creating platforms to facilitate easy transition from humanitarian in to development
- There is need for a liaison between humanitarian and development
- There is need for mitigation measures in the transition from relief into development
- Need for education for communities with regard to transition from relief into development
- Need to understand overlap between relief and development
- Use of faith-based organization as a body of evidence
- There is a need of change in the mindset among donors – keeping an open-mind
Gender; Notes
- Gender is reactive rather than proactive
- Power reflects gender equality rather than numbers
Environment and climate
change; Notes
·
- Hold the institutions in place accountable (lobbying and advocacy)
- Teach younger generations proper environmental practices
Religion; Notes
- Religious leaders should be held accountable for their actions
- Power by religious leaders is a good tool to be used by organizations to impact the community
- Extremists and religion- There should be a value- based approach running concurrently with rights- based approach
- Embracing complexity is a major factor for resilience
- Complexity demands different ways of working
Complexity;
- Is unpredictable
- Is non-linear
- Requires self-organization
Dealing with complexity requires;
- Sensitive listening to early signs of changes
- Listening to different perspectives
- Action research approaches and getting real-time data
Adaptive management- This is the concept of designing projects as a component of learning
- An adaptive system
- An adaptive mind-set
- Embracing sense-making
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; IAS NOTES
- Improve internal communication with donors on changes accompanied by proper justifications
- Include adaptive management in organizational assessment
Monitoring for
Resilience
Monitoring is the systemic collection, analysis and use of
information from projects for 3 purposes namely;
- Learning
- Accounting- both internally and externally
- Decision-making
Characteristics of a
resilient community are based on the following;
- Governance
- Risk assessment
- Knowledge and education
- Risk management
- Disaster management
Advocacy for DRR and improved resilience
Sendai framework for
disaster risk reduction targets;
- Reduce mortality
- Reduce number of affected people
- Reduce economic loss
- Reduce damage to critical infrastructure
- Increase national and local DRR strategies
- Enhance international cooperation
- Increase availability and access, early warning and risk information
IAS DRR Advocacy;
strengthening stakeholder’s knowledge in resilience by using Kenya and Ethiopia
Vision; A resilient society
Increasing resilience knowledge and advocate DRR among
different stakeholders in order to bring about behavioral change reinforcing the implementation
of policies
Actors; communities i.e. Tharaka and Borena, local
government, other stakeholders (civil societies, NGOs, UN agencies)
Behavioral changes/
strategies;
- Research
- Awareness
- Exposure
Next steps
- Inception meeting
- Finalization of Terms of Reference for the consultant/ researcher
- Identification of researcher
- Segregation of duties
Moving to Action- Reflection and planning
The main value of resilience lies in its integrative nature,
which facilitates greater collaboration between traditionally disparate groups
and communities of practice
A community of practice is a group of people who share a
concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as
they interact regularly
Organizational change is all about starting conversations and
creating environments and tools that stimulate conversation
IAS Organizational Plans
for Resilience
WHO
|
WHAT
|
WHEN
|
|
Resilience
Research
|
Head
office focal point/PM Ethiopia/ PM Kenya
|
1. Finalize ToR
2. Recruit researcher/consultant
3. Draft report
4. Final report
|
23rd
March
15th
April
15th July
15th August
|
Advocacy/
Awareness
|
Head office focal
point/PM Ethiopia/PM Kenya
|
Influence key actors
1.
Communities
2.
Local government
3.
Other stakeholders (CBOs, NGOs, UN agencies)
|
Continual process
|
Capacity
Development/adaptive Management (CCIs)
|
Head
Office focal point/PM Ethiopia/PM Kenya
|
Training
and workshops
|
September
2018 onwards
|
New
connections
|
Head office focal
point/PM Ethiopia/ PM Kenya
|
GNDR, UNISDR, IGAD etc.
|
ASAP
|
Exposure
|
Head
office focal point/PM Ethiopia/PM Kenya
|
Exchange
visits between Borena and Tharaka
|
July
and September
|
Cross cutting issues;
priorities- Environment
and climate change, gender, human-rights, Peace and conflict
AGORA Reflections
From Agora reflections, IAS has learnt a lesson to use
blogging as monitoring and evaluation measure for effective communication and
has created a blog; https://ias-resilience.blogspot.co.ke/
to showcase the IAS Resilience Research process
Comments
Post a Comment