BLOG POST 6: SHOCKS AND STRESSES AFFECTING INSTITUTIONS IN THARAKA
BLOG POST 6: SHOCKS AND STRESSES AFFECTING INSTITUTIONS IN THARAKA
This
blog post is an extension of blog post 4, which identifies and describes common
shocks and stresses in Tharaka. The blog post identifies shocks and stresses that
specifically affect or are associated with institutions. As such, this blog
post focuses on what can be described as “organizational resilience dimension”.
The
available data reveal limited information on shocks and stresses among
institutions in Tharaka. There is generally limited appreciation, both in
literature and in day-day discourse in Tharaka regarding this issue, despite
its importance and connection to community system resilience. The general
perception is that shocks and stresses affect mainly the local households and communities,
who then become recipients of assistance from organizations and institutions.
The latter are assumed either resilient or immune to common shocks and stresses
experienced in Tharaka. Key informant interviews so far held with representatives
of organizations and institutions in Tharaka do not provide a robust direct connection
between the common shocks and stresses in Tharaka with their own capacities to
provide services or general well-being. There is a tendency to see
organizations and institutions as entities that are outside the local community
system.
However,
there seem to be several shocks and stress that affect institutions. These are largely
related to the governance, and service provision dimensions of resilience
described in Blog Post 3. The main ones are follows:
·
Lack
of funds to implement planned projects. This happens due to budgetary cuts by
national treasury or late disbursement of funds.
·
Lack
of materials and resources required to offer services. e.g. veterinary services
lacking vaccines, lack of transport (vehicles, vaccines, bicycles, etc)
·
Corruption
and impunity: This is life within institutions, which undermines efficient and
effective service delivery.
·
Politics:
Some institutions complaining interference with their work by local
politicians. This hampers their ability to provide services in a free and
objective manner.
·
Understaffing
and transfers of key staff
·
Government
policies and orders from above, which undermine planned programmes
·
Huge
demand for services and assistance y local communities; over dependency on them
by local communities; local people seeking short term benefits
·
Community
expectations and cooperation. Where dependency syndrome is high, they tend to
offer support/cooperation for short-term gains and less on long-term projects.
·
Un-genuine
love by Tharaka towards NGOs and government officials.
Comments
Post a Comment