BLOG POST 9: COPING WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF SHOCKS AND STRESSES IN THARAKA
BLOG POST 9: COPING WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF SHOCKS AND STRESSES IN THARAKA
This
blog post identifies common actions of local individuals and households and
institutions to cope with common shocks and droughts that affect them. What do
they do, for example when faced with food shortage at household level due to
severe drought? What short-term and long-term coping strategies do they use? Do
men and women and the different types of households use similar or different
coping mechanisms? The blog seeks to answer the following questions: How do
local individuals, households, and institutions cope with shocks and stresses? Why
do local individuals, households, and institutions utilize these coping
strategies? How is the level of knowledge among local households regarding
organizations and institutions that can support them to mitigate the effects of
drought and other shocks and stresses?
Coping with climate-related shocks and stresses (drought and food shortages)
Traditional /
old practices
1)
Coping
with drought through saving food to be eaten in dry season (which included traditional
foods of vegetables and pumpkins).
2)
Circumcision
was withheld till there was sign of harvest.
3)
People
went to look for food to increase it even it was there. Livestockwas taken to distance
places for pasture and water.
4)
People
coped with pests and diseases by preparing smoke (toogi) using flesh green grass, cow/goat dung or use caster
(mbariki).
5)
Selling
small stocks, which include goats and chicken before selling cattle as last
resort.
6)
The village elders had a technique of coping
with droughts by using the term “Nkoma
Ikwaaria ciauga icio igutanaa” translated to mean devils have spoken, no
circumcision” because it was believed that if there will be any circumcision
done, those circumcised will die. But this was to safeguard the food because
there is no enough food in their homesteads. If the number of uncircumcised
boys were 300, the elders would slash the number to a smaller group which may
be manageable by the community and may not bring of food shortages.
7)
Selling of the livestock and poultry and
selling pieces of land when there are severe droughts. Natural fruits when the
droughts became severe.
8)
Migration to other places
9)
Begging within and outside Tharaka
Current
practices
1)
Saving
food to be eaten in dry season
2)
Taking
livestock to distance places for pasture and water.
3)
Shunning
wasteful, “dead end” social events e.g. pre-weddings.
4)
Selling
of small stocks, which include goats and chicken before selling cattle as last
resort.
5)
Menial labour especially in more endowed
counties (migration) e.g. in Timau and Nanyuki.
6)
Farming along the riverbanks during the dry
seasons
7)
Selling of the livestock and poultry
8)
Selling pieces of land when there are severe
droughts.
9)
Migration to other places by individuals and whole families
10)
Begging within and outside Tharaka
11)
Sending children to well off relatives to
“weather the storm”
12)
Remittances, gifts and other forms of
assistance from households members, friends and relatives
13)
Burning and selling of charcoal
14)
Sand harvesting
15)
Marrying off daughters
16)
Demanding payment of part of dowry from in-laws
Coping with other types of shocks and stresses
Conflicts and violence: Fighting back, moving
out of the disputed areas, making peace, persevering
Banditry: Moving out of the affecting
areas, seeking assistance from the Kenya wildlife service to intervene,
petitioning local leaders to intervene
Services provision gaps: Persevering,
seeking service in private institutions, petitioning local leaders to intervene
Bad governance (corruption and impunity): Doing
nothing/joining in the practice, persevering
Other shocks: taking individual decisions and
actions to mitigate effects of the shock or stress
Support systems for coping with common shocks and stresses
Further
analysis concerning this sub-theme is underway. More insights will emerge from
the analysis of household interviews. In the meantime, the following insights
emerge. Support systems to cope with shocks and stresses: The available support
systems include family, relief food from the government and non-profit sectors,
cash for assets from the government and NGOs, and resilience building programs
being promoted by FAO, UTaM and NDMA.There is also relief from local churches,
FBOs and well-wishers. Tharaka people in the diaspora respond in big number to
assist their brothers and sisters when there is an emergency. School Children
Programmes like the feeding programme “plate for plate” by IAS, help keep the
children in school and reduce the burden of parents in providing lunch. They
are able to look for only one meal and most preferably super. Educational
support by Compassion International: the household with beneficiary gets other
benefits like “water tanks” relief food during food shortage seasons. Redcross
has been helping the community with food vouchers. The whole ideas was
sensitizing them with best methods of farming and environmental conservation.
They would dig benches and terraces in their farms and in turn get paid by food
vouchers in the end of the month. Caritas Meru, a Faith-based Organization has
been providing “piped” clean water in many areas where people could not access
clean water at all. They also instilled programmes like “zai-pits” planting
methods which aimed at increasing the farm productivity. By the end Caritas
would give food and vouchers or direct deposits of cash in the beneficiary’saccounts.
International Aid Services give relief food in times of drought.
Gender-based coping strategies
Women cope with
stress better as they work harder than men. Boys are better than girls as they
run to where there is safety (food or security). Girls cope with stresses and
shocks more than boys as they stronger. They tolerate hard situations like
being a maid who works hard in difficult situations. According to youth FGD in
Gakurungu, ladies suffer hunger most as being in the kitchen they serve
everything to the children and men and go without food, Gakurungu Youth FGD.
Level of knowledge among local households regarding organizations and institutions that can support them to mitigate the effects of drought and other shocks and stresses
Further
analysis concerning this sub-theme is underway. More insights will emerge from
the analysis of household interviews. In the meantime, the following insights
emerge. Local people are not that knowledgeable or aware of organizations and
institutions that can support them to mitigate the effects of drought and other
shocks and disasters. Most people know of government ministries, department and
agencies, which do not do much to support them mitigate the effects of drought and
other risks. The common mentioned non-profit organizations which have operated
in select areas are Plan International, Unbound, ChildFund, Shepherds of Life,
International Aid Services, FAO, Caritas and Compassion International. Community
members mostly run to the “chief’s office” when faced with difficulties.
Comments
Post a Comment